🔗 Share this article

Itranspired he could survive losing against lower-league opposition. He weathered a decisive continental showpiece versus one of the worst Tottenham teams in living memory. He could survive home defeats to domestic rivals, finishing 15th, the tactical inflexibility, laying waste to some of the club’s most promising homegrown talent, a poor winning percentage, calling the squad the worst the club has ever seen. Yet, there existed one adversary with whom Ruben Amorim was not permitted to tango. If you challenge Jason Wilcox, you had better succeed.

Unfortunately, similar to numerous Premiership right-back during Blackburn Rovers' title-winning campaign, the coach came at the executive and seems to have failed. The most distracted of readers can see the paradoxical situation: a coach who frequently berated at his players for losing one-on-one duels succumbing when confronted by the white heat and animal charisma of one of England's top division's most intimidating sporting directors.

In truth, this entire bruising episode appears to portray the director in a different perspective. Perhaps it might have been easy, based on his brief stint in a similar role at Southampton, to regard Jason Wilcox as little more than a drudge in the United exoskeleton: an individual who owed his position as much to his friendship with ex-colleague a fellow executive rather than any verifiable talent. How wrong we all were. By masterfully outmanoeuvring United’s feted head coach, just as he bested the unfortunate Dan Ashworth before him, Jason Wilcox has demonstrated to be among the sport’s true generals: a tactical intellect that the club's mid-table rivals are now rightly wary.

The Strategic Conflict Over Formation & Ideology

For example, this was Jason Wilcox who being involved in the hierarchy that appointed the 3-4-3 fundamentalist the coach in the first place, played a key role in attempting to convince Amorim to abandon his beloved 3-4-3. Unsurprisingly, these pleas were resisted. However, such directives carry more weight when issued by a man of a man the unimpeachable soccer background of Jason Wilcox, a veteran of international appearances and a role in a championship team decades past.

Perhaps in time Jason Wilcox may be persuaded to explain his thought processes publicly. Maybe one day he might be asked why Amorim is walking away with full compensation, without any penalty clause activated. The director seldom speaks in public, and with very good reason. The true intellectuals of this sport – individuals such as Jason Wilcox – function on a plane beyond our own mundane comprehension. If he ever did speak, probably we would perceive would be ultrasonic blips and complex calculations. Desiring an explanation is not the same as being ready to comprehend it.

The Ultimate Power In Command

Naturally, in training our focus on the sporting director we overlook the real power behind the modern United throne. The director is, in reality, merely executing the directives of his ultimate superior Sir Jim Ratcliffe, who privately has made very clear his desire for a four-man defense. According to reports, Ratcliffe has also suggested playing Bryan Mbeumo in a wing-back role. The owner is eager for the club to embrace data science and analytics. According to ESPN, in an executive meeting soon after his investment, he declared that the team's approach to football “shall be decided by this group”.

Ultimately, Ratcliffe is a specialist in this technical football matters, drawing from his background in industry and sailing. Above all he remains incredibly rich, and as we all know, the rich are the best of us: more perceptive, sagacious, strategically brilliant, simply superior. Who else would you trust to oversee an enlightened programme of cost-cutting, the construction of a modern arena that looks similar to someone’s leftover knitting, the signing of Benjamin Sesko?

The Modern Soccer Hierarchy: Executives Over Coaches

This represents a shift we are increasingly seeing at the elite levels football. For decades, clubs foolishly delegated big footballing decisions to low-level employees such as coaches, talent spotters – even footballers. Perhaps it was once feasible for a young, innovative manager with a philosophy and energy to go into an organization and see their vision through to completion. Yet how many businesses have these guys set up? What number of mass redundancies have they overseen? Far preferable to place genuine authority where it rightly belongs: the executive class, the casually dressed executives, the guys with impressive LinkedIn profiles. Better by far to decide the strategy by the directors and appoint someone who will adapt their methods to suit. If managers were once chefs, they have become more akin to Deliveroo drivers: not really creating the food, yet finally accountable if it arrives cold or fails of the box.

In the meantime, a coach's role has become not about defining the vision and more about selling it: the receptionist on the front desk, the public face for a club they have minimal power to influence. A coach at Chelsea leads a team of literal children into Europe and wins domestic cups, and effectively is dismissed for talking. A manager at Celtic finds his standing damaged while those individuals who appointed him continue to make errors another day.

A Neoliberal Game: Accountability Only for the Coaches

And perhaps on some microcosmic level this is simply neoliberalism at work: the rise of a privileged elite who are infallible, whose decisions remain untouchable, whose mistakes can always be resolved by sacking without explanation. Hire the 3-4-3 coach only to dismiss him for playing too much 3-4-3. Hire the process guy and later discard them for requiring too long. And above all show gratitude; for the incremental increases in ticket costs, for the latest summer signings, for the reality that the adults – regardless of their expertise – remain in control.