🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives buried in graves at risk from coastal erosion argue that indecision on how best to address the problem is causing them unnecessary distress about the final resting places of their departed family.

An Impending Threat to Ancient Graveyards

The council have singled out three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being engulfed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A recent report on the situation sets out a range of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and relocating them in more secure sites. Officials maintain it is for local people to determine how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to serve as their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates indicate at least part of one graveyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident recalled a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, along with its church and graveyard.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. That is not the case. Individuals will collect remains as mementos and go plundering graves in search of valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril

Along the shoreline lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while working overseas. His parent expressed she could not sleep after discovering her son’s final plot might one day be relocated.

“It does trouble me to think this won’t be his lasting home,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant place to go.”

In her view, new burials should cease but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Seeking Solutions and Certainty

The lack of consensus over when and how to handle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious.

Some want additional coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to proceed for now. Different voices argue the time for relocation is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were under the care of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to decide the path to take. We are here to help support them through that process with residents.”

He added there was ample time to consider all the choices. “This concerns many years before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires good community discussions to discover the appropriate solutions for each village.”

The prospect of losing the churches and graveyards was described as one of “profound sadness for the local community,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in life after death, providing a spiritual perspective on the physical loss of sacred ground.